{
  "_comment": [
    "Phrases that must NOT appear anywhere in the wiki. qa_wiki.py --ban turns every",
    "match into an ERROR.",
    "",
    "This is the single most valuable QA artefact in the kit, and the reason is",
    "specific: in the reference run the subject's own README claimed 'syntax",
    "highlighting' and 'nested lists'. Neither existed. Both claims were plausible,",
    "both were easy to transcribe, and both would have shipped as falsehoods.",
    "",
    "Fill this in at the END of Phase 1, from research/sources.md section D",
    "('claims deliberately not made'). Format: {phrase: why it is banned}.",
    "Matching is case-insensitive substring, so write the shortest phrase that is",
    "unambiguously wrong — an affirmative claim, not a word that also appears in",
    "the correction ('syntax highlighting' would ban the sentence that says there",
    "is none; 'syntax-highlighted code blocks are produced' would not).",
    "",
    "Prefer banning the AFFIRMATIVE form of the claim.",
    "",
    "EXEMPTIONS AND NEGATIONS (added after a field run produced 10 false",
    "positives and zero real ones):",
    "  * Matching runs against a SCRUBBED view of each page: fenced code,",
    "    inline code, [[wiki-links]], ](#anchor) targets and filenames are",
    "    blanked first, so a slug or a verbatim subject string cannot fire.",
    "  * A hit preceded within ~90 characters (same sentence) by a negation",
    "    or hedging word -- no, not, never, without, lacks, false, myth,",
    "    claims, asserts, allegedly, reportedly, 'the docs say' -- is",
    "    downgraded to a WARNING, never suppressed. 'There is no GPG",
    "    verification' must stay visible to a human.",
    "  * Add an \"exemptions\" list for hits that are legitimate and would",
    "    otherwise force you to mangle accurate prose. Exemptions are",
    "    reported as INFO, so they stay visible and cannot become a",
    "    rubbish drawer.",
    "",
    "If refuting a documentation claim requires quoting it, PARAPHRASE the",
    "quote (\"the docs present restore as gated by both flag and",
    "authentication\") -- substring matching cannot tell a refutation from",
    "an assertion."
  ],
  "_template_delete_me": {
    "supports nested lists": "verified false — indented children render as literal text",
    "fully CommonMark compliant": "not conformant; entities/escapes/autolinks/indented code all diverge",
    "updates are signed": "no signature, no pinned commit — SHA-256 is a change detector only",
    "PHP 8.3 is enforced": "documented, not enforced — there is no version_compare() guard",
    "built-in syntax highlighting": "no highlighter is loaded anywhere in the repository",
    "ships an .htaccess": "no .htaccess exists in the repository; any sample is a recommendation"
  },
  "_notes": [
    "Also worth banning, once you have verified them absent:",
    "  * 'production-ready' / 'enterprise-grade' — unfalsifiable marketing",
    "  * 'simply' / 'just' before a step that is not simple",
    "  * any specific performance number you did not measure",
    "  * any version number you did not read from the source"
  ],
  "exemptions": [
    {
      "phrase": "<the banned phrase>",
      "file": "<Page Name.md>",
      "quote": "<verbatim fragment that must appear on the same line>",
      "reason": "<why this hit is legitimate — e.g. verbatim error string of the subject>"
    }
  ],
  "fluff_exemptions": [
    {
      "phrase": "unlock",
      "reason": "domain terminology: 'delete the line to unlock a hard lock'"
    },
    {
      "phrase": "magic",
      "reason": "standard term: 'PK magic bytes'"
    }
  ]
}